misc data modeling questions
-
is person name E41 appellation instead of E42 identifier? (see: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15GxAO_EtgP9av2fRA2OSAMLOJS1v718zsutUhtFMpR4/edit# ) -
should person name use type: ->P1->E41[2]->P2->E55['preferred terms'] (see: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15GxAO_EtgP9av2fRA2OSAMLOJS1v718zsutUhtFMpR4/edit# ) -
should text title use different uri for aliases? (like we do with person names) - rather use same URI
-
create ALIAS or REFERENCE by creating instances and relations separately or in one mapping? - doesn't matter
-
F4->P165->F22
instead of P128? (https://gitlab.gwdg.de/MPIWG/Department-II/ismi-cidoc-model/wikis/notes-from-george)- rather not
-
alias_identifier als literal oder als uri mit type? - lieber als URI mit type
-
notes felder als literal oder als uri mit type? - notes als PC3 mit type
-
"sonstige" felder als notes mit type? - soweit nichts spezifischeres möglich
-
is there a problem to use separate F22 for text and witness? - likely not
-
how to better model COLLECTION->is_part_of->REPOSITORY? E78->P49->E39
-
how to incorporate public IIF manifest URL in DIGITALIZATION? - as URI of digitalization
-
using two langStrings for name or title makes editing more difficult