Follow-up from "Resolve "restricted files exposed""
The following discussion from !218 (merged) should be addressed:
-
@uveentj started a discussion: I did not test it, but I share the concern, there should be an issue for this
-
@uveentj started a discussion: same as above, issue would be good
see !218 (diffs) and !218 (diffs)
Edited by Stefan Hynek