lido-development issueshttps://gitlab.gwdg.de/lido/development/-/issues2021-08-11T11:23:26Zhttps://gitlab.gwdg.de/lido/development/-/issues/119Terminology/Format recommendation: accompanying document2021-08-11T11:23:26ZHanna-Lena StolzTerminology/Format recommendation: accompanying documentDesignations and links have to be consolidated.
[Wiki](https://wiki.dnb.de/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=202447123)Designations and links have to be consolidated.
[Wiki](https://wiki.dnb.de/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=202447123)LIDO 1.1 finalmmarkus1mmarkus1https://gitlab.gwdg.de/lido/development/-/issues/104Design and Implement hierarchical view of the LIDO structure2021-08-27T08:11:32Zmmarkus1Design and Implement hierarchical view of the LIDO structureThe current LIDO documentation is based on an alphabetical list grouped by elements, complex types, attributes and Schematron rules. This is great for users who want to look up a specific element/complexType/attribute/Schematron rule. Th...The current LIDO documentation is based on an alphabetical list grouped by elements, complex types, attributes and Schematron rules. This is great for users who want to look up a specific element/complexType/attribute/Schematron rule. This is a disadvantage especially for users who orientate themselves on the basis of a typical XML structure.
The aim is to develop a hierarchical tree view based on an LIDO XML structure. This view should become a new link based navigation in addition to the current HTML documentation.LIDO 1.1 finalHanna-Lena StolzHanna-Lena Stolzhttps://gitlab.gwdg.de/lido/development/-/issues/100Rename "For an attribute the element holds" in Terminology/Format recommendation2021-08-11T09:45:20ZJutta LindenthalRename "For an attribute the element holds" in Terminology/Format recommendationRename the phrase "For an attribute the element holds" in Terminology/Format recommendation for LIDO elements into:
"For the type attribute"
Example <classification>
Terminology/Format recommendation For the element: Linked open vocabul...Rename the phrase "For an attribute the element holds" in Terminology/Format recommendation for LIDO elements into:
"For the type attribute"
Example <classification>
Terminology/Format recommendation For the element: Linked open vocabulary for Classification
For the type attribute: LIDO Terminology for Classification typemmarkus1mmarkus1https://gitlab.gwdg.de/lido/development/-/issues/99Do not show Description of attributes in elements (except for type attributes)2021-06-21T14:07:50ZJutta LindenthalDo not show Description of attributes in elements (except for type attributes)1. Do not show Description of attributes in elements (except for type attributes)
2. Delete Terminology/Format recommendation for these attributes
Example <[place](http://www.lido-schema.org/schema/v1.1/lido-v1.1-public-beta.html#place)...1. Do not show Description of attributes in elements (except for type attributes)
2. Delete Terminology/Format recommendation for these attributes
Example <[place](http://www.lido-schema.org/schema/v1.1/lido-v1.1-public-beta.html#place)>
Attributes (except type attributes) are described seperately. There is no need to show descriptions for attributes in the element's description. Further reasons to abandon the display of attribute annotations:
- Since "Data values" does not distinguish between elements and attributes, the reference may be ambiguous.
- Only a seamingly arbitrary selection of attributes is shown.LIDO 1.1 finalhttps://gitlab.gwdg.de/lido/development/-/issues/98Delete "For the element" in Terminology/Format recommendation for all LIDO at...2021-08-10T19:31:08ZJutta LindenthalDelete "For the element" in Terminology/Format recommendation for all LIDO attributesTerminology/Format recommendation refers to the described attribute, not to an element. Since the recommendation concerns the attribute only, an explicite reference is unnecessary.Terminology/Format recommendation refers to the described attribute, not to an element. Since the recommendation concerns the attribute only, an explicite reference is unnecessary.mmarkus1mmarkus1https://gitlab.gwdg.de/lido/development/-/issues/83Add missing dataValues section in PDF2021-06-28T12:20:49Zmmarkus1Add missing dataValues section in PDFThe dataValues (tei:ab type="dataValues") are currently missing in the PDF version. Cf. the HTML tranformation.The dataValues (tei:ab type="dataValues") are currently missing in the PDF version. Cf. the HTML tranformation.https://gitlab.gwdg.de/lido/development/-/issues/75Change sentence terminology recommendations for type attribute2021-06-21T14:13:40ZHanna-Lena StolzChange sentence terminology recommendations for type attributeChange sentence from: _For an attribute the element holds_ to _For the type attribute the element holds_.
Except for: placeComplexTypeChange sentence from: _For an attribute the element holds_ to _For the type attribute the element holds_.
Except for: placeComplexTypeLIDO 1.1 finalmmarkus1mmarkus1https://gitlab.gwdg.de/lido/development/-/issues/70<gml> error in May contain2021-08-11T09:48:12ZHanna-Lena Stolz<gml> error in May containTransformation error in May contain for gml: *. Links don't work (http://www.lido-schema.org/schema/v1.1/lido-v1.1-public-beta.html#gml
)
<br>**TODO**: Transformation! all external elements should be linkedTransformation error in May contain for gml: *. Links don't work (http://www.lido-schema.org/schema/v1.1/lido-v1.1-public-beta.html#gml
)
<br>**TODO**: Transformation! all external elements should be linkedmmarkus1Jutta LindenthalSophie Röllemmarkus1https://gitlab.gwdg.de/lido/development/-/issues/68eventDescriptionSet2021-06-21T12:50:24ZHanna-Lena StolzeventDescriptionSet In description of the type attribute link on CDWA does NOT open as a new tab.
<br>tei: ref check whether attribute for differentiation link external / internal is possible
<br>Add under further reading?
<br> Same under [inscriptions](ht... In description of the type attribute link on CDWA does NOT open as a new tab.
<br>tei: ref check whether attribute for differentiation link external / internal is possible
<br>Add under further reading?
<br> Same under [inscriptions](http://www.lido-schema.org/schema/v1.1/lido-v1.1-public-beta.html#inscriptions)mmarkus1Hanna-Lena Stolzmmarkus1https://gitlab.gwdg.de/lido/development/-/issues/52Establish flow for mering into main2021-05-19T16:34:09ZMichelle WeidlingEstablish flow for mering into mainLIDO 1.1 finalmmarkus1mmarkus1