TAPoR: How to deal with is_approved?
Currently, @sotiris.karampatakis is ignoring the is_approved-field when ingesting data from TAPoR. There was a discussion on this at a meeting on the mappings document. In short: maybe we should ingest such data because it could be useful but probably we need to put it in review-status to check the validy of the information. Therefore @lbarbot tried to find out, how is_approved is used by the curators of TAPoR - I can remember, that there was an answer on this but I can't find it anymore, @lbarbot do you have a clue, where this answer can be found (was it an e-mail)?
We should decide, how we deal with this field: are we ignoring is_approved or do we only ingest is_approved=true?
Adding additionally @matej.durco @frank.fischer01 into this discussion