Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit fe33dd17 authored by Christian Boulanger's avatar Christian Boulanger
Browse files

Some fixes to JLS TEI/bibl

parent 22545199
Branches
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Pipeline #511452 passed
Stage: deploy
Expand all Hide whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
convert-anystyle-data/tei-biblStruct-gold/10.1111_1467-6478.00057.xml
+ 122
− 196
View file @ fe33dd17
......@@ -61,8 +61,8 @@
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="3"><desc>3 M. Sawer and M. Simms, A Woman&#8217;s Place: Women and Politics in Australia (2nd ed., 1993).</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">A Woman&#8217;s Place: Women and Politics in Australia</title>
<monogr>
<title level="m">A Woman&#8217;s Place: Women and Politics in Australia</title>
<author>
<persName>
<forename>M.</forename>
......@@ -75,8 +75,6 @@
<surname>Simms</surname>
</persName>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<imprint>
<date>1993</date>
</imprint>
......@@ -104,7 +102,7 @@
<title level="a">Historicising Citizenship: Remembering Broken Promises</title>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<title level="j">Melbourne University Law Rev</title>
<title level="j">Melbourne University Law Rev.</title>
<imprint>
<date>1996</date>
</imprint>
......@@ -147,7 +145,6 @@
<date>1991</date>
</imprint>
<biblScope unit="page" from="125" to="6">125&#8211;6</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="146">146</biblScope>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="7"><desc>7 U. Vogel, &#8216;Marriage and the Boundaries of Citizenship&#8217; in The Condition of Citizenship, ed. B. van Steenbergen (1994) 75.</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
......@@ -195,27 +192,22 @@
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="9"><desc>9 Vogel, id., p. 79. W. Blackstone, Commentaries (Facsimile of 1st. ed. of 1765&#8211;69, 1979) 442.</desc><biblStruct/><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">Commentaries</title>
<monogr>
<title level="m">Commentaries</title>
<author>
<persName>
<forename>W.</forename>
<surname>Blackstone</surname>
</persName>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<imprint>
<date>1979</date>
</imprint>
<biblScope unit="page" from="442">442</biblScope>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="11"><desc>11 Vogel, op. cit., n. 7, pp. 80&#8211;1.</desc><biblStruct/></listBibl><listBibl n="12"><desc>12 F. Haug (ed.), Female Sexualization: A Collective Work of Memory (1987) 196.</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">Female Sexualization: A Collective Work of Memory</title>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<title level="m">Female Sexualization: A Collective Work of Memory</title>
<editor>
<persName>
<forename>F.</forename>
......@@ -225,7 +217,6 @@
<imprint>
<date>1987</date>
</imprint>
<biblScope unit="page" from="196">196</biblScope>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="13"><desc>13 A. Bottomley, &#8216;Self and Subjectivities: Languages of Claim in Property Law&#8217; (1993) 20 J. of Law and Society 56, 61.</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
......@@ -245,10 +236,9 @@
</imprint>
<biblScope unit="volume" from="20" to="20">20</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="56">56</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="61">61</biblScope>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="14"><desc>14 D. West, &#8216;Power and Formation: New Foundations for a Radical Concept of Power&#8217; (1987)</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
</listBibl><listBibl n="14"><desc>14 D. West, &#8216;Power and Formation: New Foundations for a Radical Concept of Power&#8217; (1987) 30 Inquiry 137, 145. Compare M. Foucault, Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972&#8211;1977, ed. C. Gordon (1980) 98.</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">Power and Formation: New Foundations for a Radical Concept of Power</title>
<author>
......@@ -259,31 +249,23 @@
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<title level="j">Inquiry</title>
<imprint>
<date>1987</date>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="30"><desc>30 Inquiry 137, 145. Compare M. Foucault, Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972&#8211;1977, ed. C. Gordon (1980) 98.</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">Inquiry 137</title>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<imprint/>
<biblScope unit="page" from="145">145</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="volume">30</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page">137</biblScope>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972&#8211;1977</title>
<monogr>
<title level="m">Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972&#8211;1977</title>
<author>
<persName>
<forename>M.</forename>
<surname>Foucault</surname>
</persName>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<editor>
<persName>
<forename>C.</forename>
......@@ -293,7 +275,6 @@
<imprint>
<date>1980</date>
</imprint>
<biblScope unit="page" from="98">98</biblScope>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="15"><desc>15 For a detailed analysis of legal method and the political role it plays, see M.J. Mossman, &#8216;Feminism, and Legal Method: The Difference it Makes&#8217; (1986) 3 Aust. J. of Law and Society 30.</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
......@@ -316,72 +297,59 @@
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="16"><desc>16 H.S. Maine, Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society and its Relation to Modern Ideas (10th ed., 1912) 174.</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society and its Relation to Modern Ideas</title>
<monogr>
<title level="m">Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society and its Relation to Modern Ideas</title>
<author>
<persName>
<forename>H.S.</forename>
<surname>Maine</surname>
</persName>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<imprint>
<date>1912</date>
</imprint>
<biblScope unit="page" from="174">174</biblScope>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="17"><desc>17 This was particularly the case in the United States of America. See M.J. Horwitz, The Transformation of American Law, 1780&#8211;1860 (1977) 160.</desc><biblStruct/><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">The Transformation of American Law, 1780&#8211;1860</title>
<monogr>
<title level="m">The Transformation of American Law, 1780&#8211;1860</title>
<author>
<persName>
<forename>M.J.</forename>
<surname>Horwitz</surname>
</persName>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<imprint>
<date>1977</date>
</imprint>
<biblScope unit="page" from="160">160</biblScope>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="18"><desc>18 M. Grossberg, Governing the Hearth: Law and the Family in Nineteenth-Century America (1985) ix.</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">Governing the Hearth: Law and the Family in Nineteenth-Century America</title>
<monogr>
<title level="m">Governing the Hearth: Law and the Family in Nineteenth-Century America</title>
<author>
<persName>
<forename>M.</forename>
<surname>Grossberg</surname>
</persName>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<imprint>
<date>1985</date>
</imprint>
<biblScope unit="page" from="ix">ix</biblScope>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="19"><desc>19 Staves postulates that the position was somewhat more complicated in that marriage, as a status, crumbled in response to contract ideology in the seventeenth century but, by the end of the eighteenth century, deeper patriarchal structures were re-imposed. See S. Staves, Married Women&#8217;s Separate Property in England, 1660&#8211;1833 (1990) 4, 220.</desc><biblStruct/><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">Married Women&#8217;s Separate Property in England, 1660&#8211;1833</title>
<monogr>
<title level="m">Married Women&#8217;s Separate Property in England, 1660&#8211;1833</title>
<author>
<persName>
<forename>S.</forename>
<surname>Staves</surname>
</persName>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<imprint>
<date>1990</date>
</imprint>
<biblScope unit="volume" from="4" to="4">4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="220">220</biblScope>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="20"><desc>20 Siegel presents a valuable study of the changing norms of marriage in the context of wife beating. See R.B. Siegel, &#8216;"The Rule of Love&#8221;: Wife Beating as Prerogative and Privacy&#8217; (1996) 105 Yale Law J. 2117.</desc><biblStruct/><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
......@@ -395,7 +363,7 @@
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<title level="j">Yale Law J</title>
<title level="j">Yale Law J.</title>
<imprint>
<date>1996</date>
</imprint>
......@@ -404,36 +372,31 @@
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="21"><desc>21 C. Pateman, The Sexual Contract (1988). For further analysis of the marriage contract, see K. O&#8217;Donovan, Family Matters (1993), especially 43&#8211;59.</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">The Sexual Contract</title>
<monogr>
<title level="m">The Sexual Contract</title>
<author>
<persName>
<forename>C.</forename>
<surname>Pateman</surname>
</persName>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<imprint>
<date>1988</date>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">Family Matters</title>
<monogr>
<title level="m">Family Matters</title>
<author>
<persName>
<forename>K.</forename>
<surname>O&#8217;Donovan</surname>
</persName>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<imprint>
<date>1993</date>
</imprint>
<biblScope unit="page" from="especially">especially 43&#8211;59</biblScope>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="23"><desc>23 Crimes (Sexual Assault) Amendment Act 1981 (N.S.W.); Criminal Law Consolidation Act Amendment Act 1976 (S.A.); Criminal Code (Sexual Offences) Act 1987 (Tas.); Crimes (Sexual Offences) 1991 (Vic.); Acts Amendment (Sexual Assault) Act 1985 (W.A.). The High Court upheld the validity of the South Australian law in 1991 (see R. v. L. (1991) 103 A.L.R. 577), the same year that the House of Lords abolished the immunity (see R. v. R. [1991] 2 All E.R. 257).</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
......@@ -539,49 +502,40 @@
<imprint>
<date>1995</date>
</imprint>
<biblScope unit="page" from="127">127 and throughout</biblScope>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct/></listBibl><listBibl n="25"><desc>25 P.S. Atiyah, An Introduction to the Law of Contract (5th ed., 1995) 3.</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">An Introduction to the Law of Contract</title>
<monogr>
<title level="m">An Introduction to the Law of Contract</title>
<author>
<persName>
<forename>P.S.</forename>
<surname>Atiyah</surname>
</persName>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<imprint>
<date>1995</date>
</imprint>
<biblScope unit="page" from="3">3</biblScope>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="26"><desc>26 The Australian Law Reform Commission has addressed the issue and recommended recognition of prenuptial agreements. See A.L.R.C., Matrimonial Property, report no. 37 (1987); A.L.R.C. ., Report of the Joint Select Committee on Certain Aspects of the Operation and Interpretation of the Family Law Act (1992). For critique, see M. Neave, &#8216;Private Ordering in Family Law &#8211; Will Women Benefit?&#8217; in Thornton, op. cit., n. 4. For a feminist critique of contract in the American context, see C. Dalton, &#8216;An Essay in the Deconstruction of Contract Doctrine&#8217; (1985) 94 Yale Law J. 997.</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">Matrimonial Property</title>
<monogr>
<title level="m">Matrimonial Property, report no. 37</title>
<author>
<orgName>A.L.R.C.</orgName>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<title level="j">report no. 37</title>
<imprint>
<date>1987</date>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">Report of the Joint Select Committee on Certain Aspects of the Operation and Interpretation of the Family
<monogr>
<title level="m">Report of the Joint Select Committee on Certain Aspects of the Operation and Interpretation of the Family
Law Act</title>
<author>
<orgName>A.L.R.C.</orgName>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<imprint>
<date>1992</date>
</imprint>
......@@ -598,7 +552,11 @@
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<title level="m">Thornton</title>
<editor>
<persName>
<surname>Thornton</surname>
</persName>
</editor>
<imprint/>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
......@@ -613,7 +571,7 @@
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<title level="j">Yale Law J</title>
<title level="j">Yale Law J.</title>
<imprint>
<date>1985</date>
</imprint>
......@@ -622,8 +580,8 @@
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="27"><desc>27 L. J. Weitzman, The Marriage Contract: Spouses, Lovers, and the Law (1981) 347 ff.</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">The Marriage Contract: Spouses, Lovers, and the Law</title>
<monogr>
<title level="m">The Marriage Contract: Spouses, Lovers, and the Law</title>
<author>
<persName>
<forename>L.</forename>
......@@ -631,12 +589,9 @@
<surname>Weitzman</surname>
</persName>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<imprint>
<date>1981</date>
</imprint>
<biblScope unit="page" from="347">347</biblScope>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="28"><desc>28 Grossberg, op. cit., n. 18, p. 52.</desc><biblStruct/></listBibl><listBibl n="29"><desc>29 V. Balfour [1919] 2 K.B. 571.</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
......@@ -656,16 +611,14 @@
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="30"><desc>30 Freeman, op. cit., n. 24. While acknowledging the trends towards contractualism and private ordering, Regan cautions against it, noting that greater freedom to contract invites greater scrutiny by the courts. More significantly, however, he would rather reclaim the idea of status by injecting it with new notions of responsibility and relationality, as well as divesting it of its sexist assumptions. See M.C. Regan ., Family Law and the Pursuit of Intimacy (1993).</desc><biblStruct/><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">Family Law and the Pursuit of Intimacy</title>
<monogr>
<title level="m">Family Law and the Pursuit of Intimacy</title>
<author>
<persName>
<forename>M.C.</forename>
<surname>Regan</surname>
</persName>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<imprint>
<date>1993</date>
</imprint>
......@@ -699,17 +652,17 @@
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="32"><desc>32 G.S. Frost, Promises Broken: Courtship, Class, and Gender in Victorian England (1995); Thornton, op. cit. (1996), n. 4.</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">Promises Broken: Courtship, Class, and Gender in Victorian England (1995)</title>
<monogr>
<title level="m">Promises Broken: Courtship, Class, and Gender in Victorian England</title>
<author>
<persName>
<forename>G.S.</forename>
<surname>Frost</surname>
</persName>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<imprint/>
<imprint>
<date>1995</date>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct/></listBibl><listBibl n="33"><desc>33 Grossberg, op. cit., n. 18, p. 38.</desc><biblStruct/></listBibl><listBibl n="34"><desc>34 Compare U. Vogel, &#8216;Is Citizenship Gender-Specific?&#8217; in The Frontiers of Citizenship, eds. U. Vogel and M. Moran (1991) 59.</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
......@@ -751,25 +704,22 @@
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="36"><desc>36 Compare J. Pahl, Money and Marriage (1989) 5.</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">Money and Marriage</title>
<monogr>
<title level="m">Money and Marriage</title>
<author>
<persName>
<forename>J.</forename>
<surname>Pahl</surname>
</persName>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<imprint>
<date>1989</date>
</imprint>
<biblScope unit="page" from="5">5</biblScope>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="37"><desc>37 Although Australia, like the United Kingdom, has a separate property regime, the courts are endowed with broad powers under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cwth.) to distribute property equitably. For detailed treatment, see P. Parkinson S. Parker and J. Behrens, Australian Family Law in Context: Commentary and Materials (1994). Most civil law countries and most American states have developed community property regimes which recognize the joint ownership of property acquired during marriage, but the legal significance is similarly directed to the time of divorce. For discussion of the position during marriage, see J.T. Oldham, &#8216;Management of the Community Estate during an Intact Marriage&#8217; (1993) 56 Law and Contemporary Problems 99. For a discussion of the genesis of the two systems, see C. Donahue, &#8216;What Causes Fundamental Legal Ideas? Marital Property in England and France in the Thirteenth Century&#8217; (1979) 78 Michigan Law Rev. 59.</desc><biblStruct/><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">Australian Family Law in Context: Commentary and Materials</title>
<monogr>
<title level="m">Australian Family Law in Context: Commentary and Materials</title>
<author>
<persName>
<forename>P.</forename>
......@@ -783,8 +733,6 @@
<surname>Behrens</surname>
</persName>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<imprint>
<date>1994</date>
</imprint>
......@@ -820,7 +768,7 @@
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<title level="j">Michigan Law Rev</title>
<title level="j">Michigan Law Rev.</title>
<imprint>
<date>1979</date>
</imprint>
......@@ -859,36 +807,31 @@
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="41"><desc>41 J. Nedelsky, Private Property and the Limits of American Constitutionalism: The Madisonian Framework and its Legacy (1990), especially 223 ff</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">Private Property and the Limits of American Constitutionalism: The Madisonian Framework and its Legacy</title>
<monogr>
<title level="m">Private Property and the Limits of American Constitutionalism: The Madisonian Framework and its Legacy</title>
<author>
<persName>
<forename>J.</forename>
<surname>Nedelsky</surname>
</persName>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<imprint>
<date>1990</date>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="42"><desc>42 C.B. Macpherson, Democratic Theory: Essays in Retrieval (1973) 120.</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">Democratic Theory: Essays in Retrieval</title>
<monogr>
<title level="m">Democratic Theory: Essays in Retrieval</title>
<author>
<persName>
<forename>C.B.</forename>
<surname>Macpherson</surname>
</persName>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<imprint>
<date>1973</date>
</imprint>
<biblScope unit="page" from="120">120</biblScope>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="43"><desc>43 For example, N. Howell, &#8216;&#8220;Sexually Transmitted Debt&#8221;: A Feminist Analysis of Laws Regulating Guarantors and Co-Borrowers&#8217; (1995) 4 Aust. Feminist Law J. 93.</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
......@@ -946,7 +889,6 @@
</imprint>
<biblScope unit="volume" from="57" to="57">57</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="467">467,</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="468">468</biblScope>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
......@@ -981,7 +923,9 @@
</listBibl><listBibl n="47"><desc>47 Examples are legion, and by no means confined to the more sensational criminal law cases picked up by the media, such as R. v. Johns, Supreme Court of South Australia, 26 August 1992 (unreported) in which Bollen J. stated that it was acceptable for a husband to resort to &#8216;rougher than usual handling&#8217; to persuade his wife to have sex with him. For examples relating to STD, see Howell, op. cit., n. 43.</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<monogr>
<title level="m">R. v. Johns</title>
<title level="m">Supreme Court of South Australia</title>
<author>
<orgName>Supreme Court of South Australia</orgName>
</author>
<imprint>
<date>26 August 1992</date>
</imprint>
......@@ -1068,8 +1012,8 @@
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="56"><desc>56 See I.J. Hardingham and M.A. Neave, Australian Family Property Law (1984) 94.</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">Australian Family Property Law</title>
<monogr>
<title level="m">Australian Family Property Law</title>
<author>
<persName>
<forename>I.J.</forename>
......@@ -1082,35 +1026,28 @@
<surname>Neave</surname>
</persName>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<imprint>
<date>1984</date>
</imprint>
<biblScope unit="page" from="94">94</biblScope>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="57"><desc>57 Compare K. O&#8217;Donovan, Sexual Divisions in Law (1985), especially 112&#8211;18.</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">Sexual Divisions in Law</title>
<monogr>
<title level="m">Sexual Divisions in Law</title>
<author>
<persName>
<forename>K.</forename>
<surname>O&#8217;Donovan</surname>
</persName>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<imprint>
<date>1985</date>
</imprint>
<biblScope unit="page" from="especially">especially 112&#8211;18</biblScope>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="58"><desc>58 Although Reich&#8217;s work on the conceptualization of non-traditional sources of wealth, such as employment and professional qualifications, as forms of &#8216;new property&#8217; has been influential, he did not broach the subject of caring work. See C.A. Reich, &#8216;The New Property&#8217; (1964) 73 Yale Law J. 733. Despite a greater sensitivity to the interests of women, as well as writing almost two decades later, Glendon also fails to address the question of unpaid work as a form of property. See M.A. Glendon, The New Family and the New Property (1981).</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">The New Property</title>
<title level="a">The New Family and the New Property</title>
<author>
<persName>
<forename>C.A.</forename>
......@@ -1126,6 +1063,7 @@
</analytic>
<monogr>
<title level="j">Yale Law J.</title>
<title level="m">The New Family and the New Property</title>
<imprint>
<date>1964</date>
<date>1981</date>
......@@ -1134,7 +1072,19 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="733">733</biblScope>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="59"><desc>59 1992) 29 N.S.W.L.R. 188 (C.A .)</desc><biblStruct/></listBibl><listBibl n="60"><desc>60 Trusts of this kind have been judicially created in order to obviate injustice. Ironically, such devices have been commonly utilized over the last twenty years or so in property disputes arising out of de facto relationships, where divisibility has permitted separate interests to crystallize in ways not recognized within marriage. For a discussion of recent trends in Australia, see P. Parkinson, &#8216;Property Rights and Third Party Creditors &#8211; the Scope and Limitations of Equitable Doctrines&#8217; (1997) 11 Australian J. Family Law 100.</desc><biblStruct/><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
</listBibl><listBibl n="59"><desc>59 1992) 29 N.S.W.L.R. 188 (C.A.)</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<monogr>
<title level="m">National Australia Bank Ltd v. Garcia</title>
<title level="j">N.S.W.L.R.</title>
<imprint>
<date>1996</date>
<pubPlace>N.S.W.C.A.</pubPlace>
</imprint>
<biblScope unit="volume" from="39" to="39">39</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="577">577</biblScope>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="60"><desc>60 Trusts of this kind have been judicially created in order to obviate injustice. Ironically, such devices have been commonly utilized over the last twenty years or so in property disputes arising out of de facto relationships, where divisibility has permitted separate interests to crystallize in ways not recognized within marriage. For a discussion of recent trends in Australia, see P. Parkinson, &#8216;Property Rights and Third Party Creditors &#8211; the Scope and Limitations of Equitable Doctrines&#8217; (1997) 11 Australian J. Family Law 100.</desc><biblStruct/><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">Property Rights and Third Party Creditors &#8211; the Scope and Limitations of Equitable Doctrines</title>
<author>
......@@ -1164,7 +1114,7 @@
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<title level="j">Sydney Law Rev</title>
<title level="j">Sydney Law Rev.</title>
<imprint>
<date>1994</date>
</imprint>
......@@ -1172,12 +1122,12 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="412">412</biblScope>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="62"><desc>62 The Justice T. E. Lindenmayer and P.A. Doolan, &#8216;When Bankruptcy and Family Law Collide&#8217; (1994) 8 Aust. J. Family Law 111 133.</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
</listBibl><listBibl n="62"><desc>62 The Justice T. E. Lindenmayer and P.A. Doolan, &#8216;When Bankruptcy and Family Law Collide&#8217; (1994) 8 Aust. J. Family Law 111, 133.</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">When Bankruptcy and Family Law Collide</title>
<author>
<persName>
<forename>Justice</forename>
<roleName type="honorific">Justice</roleName>
<forename>T. E.</forename>
<surname>Lindenmayer</surname>
</persName>
......@@ -1196,7 +1146,6 @@
</imprint>
<biblScope unit="volume" from="8" to="8">8</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="111">111</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="133">133</biblScope>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="63"><desc>63 B. Bennett, &#8216;The Economics of Wifing Services: Law and Economics on the Family&#8217; (1991) 18 J. of Law and Society 206.</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
......@@ -1219,8 +1168,8 @@
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="64"><desc>64 O&#8217;Donovan, op. cit., n. 57; Thornton, op. cit. (1995), n. 4.</desc><biblStruct/><biblStruct/></listBibl><listBibl n="65"><desc>65 N.S.W.C.A., unreported, 23 May 1994.</desc><biblStruct/></listBibl><listBibl n="66"><desc>66 For detailed discussion of the ramifications, see L.J. Weitzman, The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in America (1985).</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in
<monogr>
<title level="m">The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in
America</title>
<author>
<persName>
......@@ -1228,31 +1177,32 @@
<surname>Weitzman</surname>
</persName>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<imprint>
<date>1985</date>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="67"><desc>67 M.L. Shanley, Feminism, Marriage, and the Law in Victorian England, 1850&#8211;1895 (1989) 46.</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">Feminism, Marriage, and the Law in Victorian England, 1850&#8211;1895</title>
<monogr>
<title level="m">Feminism, Marriage, and the Law in Victorian England, 1850&#8211;1895</title>
<author>
<persName>
<forename>M.L.</forename>
<surname>Shanley</surname>
</persName>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<imprint>
<date>1989</date>
</imprint>
<biblScope unit="page" from="46">46</biblScope>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="68"><desc>68 The move to contract as the governing principle of family law has been noted by commentators. See, for example, Freeman, op. cit., n. 24; Neave, op. cit., n. 26; Regan, op. cit., n. 30.</desc><biblStruct/><biblStruct/><biblStruct/><biblStruct/></listBibl><listBibl n="69"><desc>69 Bryson v. Bryant in respect of which, it might be noted, the High Court refused leave to appeal. Marcia Neave notes the &#8216;artificiality&#8217; of the concept of intention in a discussion of the constructive trust in the context of de facto spouses. See M. Neave &#8216;Three Approaches to Family Law Disputes &#8211; Intention/Belief, Unjust Enrichment and Unconscionability&#8217; in Equity, Fiduciaries and Trusts, ed. T.G. Youdan (1989) 262&#8211;4.</desc><biblStruct/><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
</listBibl><listBibl n="68"><desc>68 The move to contract as the governing principle of family law has been noted by commentators. See, for example, Freeman, op. cit., n. 24; Neave, op. cit., n. 26; Regan, op. cit., n. 30.</desc><biblStruct/><biblStruct/><biblStruct/><biblStruct/></listBibl><listBibl n="69"><desc>69 Bryson v. Bryant in respect of which, it might be noted, the High Court refused leave to appeal. Marcia Neave notes the &#8216;artificiality&#8217; of the concept of intention in a discussion of the constructive trust in the context of de facto spouses. See M. Neave &#8216;Three Approaches to Family Law Disputes &#8211; Intention/Belief, Unjust Enrichment and Unconscionability&#8217; in Equity, Fiduciaries and Trusts, ed. T.G. Youdan (1989) 262&#8211;4.</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<monogr>
<title level="m">Bryson v. Bryant</title>
<imprint/>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">Three Approaches to Family Law Disputes &#8211; Intention/Belief, Unjust Enrichment and Unconscionability&#8217;</title>
<author>
......@@ -1273,7 +1223,7 @@
<imprint>
<date>1989</date>
</imprint>
<biblScope unit="page" from="262" to="4">262&#8211;4</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="262" to="264">262&#8211;4</biblScope>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="70"><desc>70 For an interesting case study of this phenomenon, see L. Sarmas, &#8216;Storytelling and the Law: A Case Study of Louth v. Diprose&#8217; (1994) 19 Melbourne University Law Rev. 701.</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
......@@ -1295,7 +1245,7 @@
<biblScope unit="page" from="701">701</biblScope>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="71"><desc>71 C. Colebrook, &#8216;Feminist Ethics and Historicism&#8217; (1996) 11 Aust. Feminist Studies 295 300.</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
</listBibl><listBibl n="71"><desc>71 C. Colebrook, &#8216;Feminist Ethics and Historicism&#8217; (1996) 11 Aust. Feminist Studies 295, 300.</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">Feminist Ethics and Historicism</title>
<author>
......@@ -1311,13 +1261,12 @@
<date>1996</date>
</imprint>
<biblScope unit="volume" from="11" to="11">11</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="295">295</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="300">300</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="295">295,</biblScope>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="72"><desc>72 M. Albertson Fineman, The Neutered Mother, the Sexual Family and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies (1995) 7.</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">The Neutered Mother, the Sexual Family and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies</title>
<monogr>
<title level="m">The Neutered Mother, the Sexual Family and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies</title>
<author>
<persName>
<forename>M.</forename>
......@@ -1325,15 +1274,12 @@
<surname>Fineman</surname>
</persName>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<imprint>
<date>1995</date>
</imprint>
<biblScope unit="page" from="7">7</biblScope>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="73"><desc>73 Compare K. O&#8217;Donovan, &#8216;Should all Maintenance of Spouses be abolished?&#8217; (1982) 45 Modern Law Rev. 424 431&#8211;3.</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
</listBibl><listBibl n="73"><desc>73 Compare K. O&#8217;Donovan, &#8216;Should all Maintenance of Spouses be abolished?&#8217; (1982) 45 Modern Law Rev. 424, 431&#8211;3.</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">Should all Maintenance of Spouses be abolished?</title>
<author>
......@@ -1344,16 +1290,15 @@
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<title level="j">Modern Law Rev</title>
<title level="j">Modern Law Rev.</title>
<imprint>
<date>1982</date>
</imprint>
<biblScope unit="volume" from="45" to="45">45</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="424">424</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="431" to="3">431&#8211;3</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="424">424,</biblScope>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="74"><desc>74 For example, De Facto Relationships Act 1984 (N.S.W .). For detailed analysis of the policy considerations, see M.D.A. Freeman and C.M. Lyon, Cohabitation without Marriage: An Essay in Law and Social Policy (1983); New South Wales Law Reform Commission, De Facto Relationships: Issues Paper (1981).</desc><biblStruct/><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
</listBibl><listBibl n="74"><desc>74 For example, De Facto Relationships Act 1984 (N.S.W .). For detailed analysis of the policy considerations, see M.D.A. Freeman and C.M. Lyon, Cohabitation without Marriage: An Essay in Law and Social Policy (1983); New South Wales Law Reform Commission, De Facto Relationships: Issues Paper (1981).</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<monogr>
<title level="m">De Facto Relationships Act</title>
<imprint>
......@@ -1363,8 +1308,8 @@
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">Cohabitation without Marriage: An Essay in Law and Social Policy</title>
<monogr>
<title level="m">Cohabitation without Marriage: An Essay in Law and Social Policy</title>
<author>
<persName>
<forename>M.D.A.</forename>
......@@ -1377,47 +1322,41 @@
<surname>Lyon</surname>
</persName>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<imprint>
<date>1983</date>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">De Facto Relationships: Issues Paper</title>
<monogr>
<title level="m">De Facto Relationships: Issues Paper</title>
<author>
<persName>
<forename>New</forename>
<forename>South Wales Law Reform</forename>
<surname>Commission</surname>
</persName>
<orgName>New South Wales Law Reform Commission</orgName>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<imprint>
<date>1981</date>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="75"><desc>75 Eds. of the Harvard Law Review, Sexual Orientation and the Law (1990); Dean v. District of Columbia 653 U.S. App. D.C 307 (1995); C. Overington, &#8216;Why can&#8217;t They Marry?&#8217; The Age, 26 April 1997.</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">Sexual Orientation and the Law</title>
<author>
<persName>
<forename>Eds. of the Harvard</forename>
<forename>Law</forename>
<surname>Review</surname>
</persName>
</author>
</analytic>
</listBibl><listBibl n="75"><desc>75 Eds. of the Harvard Law Review, Sexual Orientation and the Law (1990); Dean v. District of Columbia 653 U.S. App. D.C. 307 (1995); C. Overington, &#8216;Why can&#8217;t They Marry?&#8217; The Age, 26 April 1997.</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<monogr>
<title level="m">Sexual Orientation and the Law</title>
<author>Eds. of the Harvard Law Review</author>
<imprint>
<date>1990</date>
</imprint>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<monogr>
<title level="m">Dean v. District of Columbia</title>
<title level="j">U.S. App. D.C.</title>
<imprint>
<date>1995</date>
</imprint>
<biblScope unit="volume">653</biblScope>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">Why can&#8217;t They Marry?</title>
......@@ -1429,32 +1368,19 @@
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<title level="m">Dean v. District of Columbia 653 U.S. App. D.C</title>
<title level="j">The Age</title>
<imprint>
<date>1995</date>
<date>1997</date>
<date when="1997-04">April 1997</date>
</imprint>
<biblScope unit="page" from="26">26</biblScope>
</monogr>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl><listBibl n="76"><desc>76 For example, Lesbian Gay Rights Service and The Bride Wore Pink; Legal Recognition of Our Relationships (1994).</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<analytic>
<title level="a">The Bride Wore Pink; Legal Recognition of Our Relationships</title>
<author>
<persName>
<surname>Lesbian</surname>
</persName>
</author>
</listBibl><listBibl n="76"><desc>76 For example, Lesbian and Gay Rights Service The Bride Wore Pink; Legal Recognition of Our Relationships (1994).</desc><biblStruct xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<monogr>
<title level="m">The Bride Wore Pink; Legal Recognition of Our Relationships</title>
<author>
<persName>
<forename>Gay</forename>
<forename>Rights</forename>
<surname>Service</surname>
</persName>
<orgName>Lesbian and Gay Rights Service</orgName>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr>
<imprint>
<date>1994</date>
</imprint>
......
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please register or to comment