v0.3.9
Merge request reports
Activity
Filter activity
added 2 commits
added 6 commits
- 1a38a0a0 - Initialize boxgrid with correct vectors to avoid double allocation
- 7648002b - Error on unsuccessful boxing
- 3d5e6282 - fold_back particles *after* flushing additions
- 98cc1af8 - output particle position for failed boxing to help with future debugging
- faaec39f - Add fold_back! before evolve loop for consistency
- d26f5b86 - Merge branch 'boxingtweaks' into 'dev'
Toggle commit listadded 10 commits
- b8b59536 - isserializable function
- 4b9b639b - Fix inconsistent generic definitions of deserialize
- 802613ee - Define export system constants early, so they can be used everywhere
- 3877e6aa - first versions of serializetodict and deserializefromdict
- ff7d1f01 - deserialize: forgot to commit removal of superfluous definition
- c0678653 - @exportrecursive: Use new dict serialization functions
- ed75cde3 - Remove outdated genexport warning from docs
- 7da82f7e - Remove references to "params" from serialization docs (scalar export can be any type).
- 87ff06d0 - further serialization docs tweaking
- 609a4035 - Merge branch 'exporttweaks' into 'dev'
Toggle commit listadded 1 commit
- 43d75818 - Hot"fix": function to check whether a dict is deserializable
added 3 commits
- d7977f91 - jld2 readdict for nested dicts, fixes #24 (closed)
- 80949fc8 - comment in case we ever come back to this
- fa6587ec - Merge branch 'jld2nesteddicts' into 'dev'
- Resolved by Philip Bittihn
I checked that the boxing improvements only change the simulation outcomes in the way we expect (slight differences for periodic boundary conditions), so, in my opinion, this is almost ready, after we have decided what to do about !8 (closed). Still have to update
CHANGELOG
, though.
added 2 commits
mentioned in merge request !8 (closed)
- Resolved by Lukas Hupe
added 1 commit
- 4dbd75a8 - Fix docs for deserializefromdict (unfinished sentence)
- Resolved by Philip Bittihn
@pbittih since you did most of the work for this one, can you have a quick look at the changelog before we merge?
requested review from @pbittih
Please register or sign in to reply