Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
  1. Feb 23, 2023
    • Feanil Patel's avatar
      · 7af5f641
      Feanil Patel authored
      build: Creating a missing workflow file `add-remove-label-on-comment.yml`.
      
      The .github/workflows/add-remove-label-on-comment.yml workflow is missing or needs an update to stay in
      sync with the current standard for this workflow as defined in the
      `.github` repo of the `openedx` GitHub org.
      7af5f641
    • Feanil Patel's avatar
      · 94dfaf40
      Feanil Patel authored
      build: Creating a missing workflow file `self-assign-issue.yml`.
      
      The .github/workflows/self-assign-issue.yml workflow is missing or needs an update to stay in
      sync with the current standard for this workflow as defined in the
      `.github` repo of the `openedx` GitHub org.
      94dfaf40
  2. Dec 09, 2022
  3. Nov 21, 2022
  4. Jul 27, 2022
  5. Apr 25, 2022
  6. Feb 23, 2022
  7. Jan 31, 2022
  8. Oct 07, 2021
  9. Oct 06, 2021
  10. May 27, 2021
    • Sarina Canelake's avatar
      build: remove OpsGenie alert for Python upgrade failures · ce9d7043
      Sarina Canelake authored
      The Community Engineering team has agreed that we would only like to get tagged on Python upgrade notifications, not paged in Ops Genie. This PR removes OG notification and also removes the team-reviewers as that was not working; we are moving to being tagged in the CODEOWNERS file.
      ce9d7043
  11. May 26, 2021
    • stvn's avatar
      build: add CODEOWNERS; edx/community-engineering · 4276e4d0
      stvn authored
      Background
      ==========
      As part of our Squad-based ownership, we should stay on top of what
      happens in these repositories. However, due to the number of
      repositories (and subsequently pull requests) across the edX ecosystem,
      it is challenging to stay on top of notifications, separating the
      'signal' from the 'noise'. Email filters can go a long way to taming
      Inbox notifications, but this is manual and requires maintenance as
      Squad ownership changes. It also fails to account for Github-specific behavior.
      
      Proposal
      ========
      By leveraging Github support for `CODEOWNERS` files [1],
      we can ensure that our team is at least CCed explicitly, here,
      in the form a requested review. This request is just that, a request,
      not a requirement; we are not enacting any new merge requirements
      at this time.
      
      - [1] https://docs.github.com/en/github/creating-cloning-and-archiving-repositories/about-code-owners
      4276e4d0
  12. May 24, 2021
  13. May 11, 2021
Loading